Kelsey Fitzsimmons was acquitted of assault with a dangerous weapon on March 26, 2026, in North Andover, Massachusetts. The trial, presided over by Judge Jeffrey Karp, centered around a shooting incident that occurred on June 30, 2025, during which Fitzsimmons was shot by Officer Patrick Noonan.
The trial began with opening statements and witness testimony, and Fitzsimmons had waived her right to a jury trial. She testified that she only pointed the gun at her own head in a suicide attempt, stating, “I wanted to kill myself, me and my gun, no one else involved.” This emotional testimony was a pivotal moment in the proceedings.
Judge Karp deliberated for less than two hours before reaching the verdict, stating, “I am left with a reasonable doubt and I am duty-bound to find that the Commonwealth has not met its burden to prove that Ms. Fitzsimmons committed an assault by means of a dangerous weapon.” This decision came after Fitzsimmons had spent 103 days in jail following the incident.
The prosecution argued that Fitzsimmons lied about the circumstances of the shooting, with attorney James Gubitose asserting, “She got up on that stand and she lied to you. It’s scientifically and physically impossible for her story to have happened the way that she said.” However, the lack of body camera footage from the police officers involved added complexity to the case.
Fitzsimmons had been emotionally devastated after being served a restraining order by her ex-fiancé, which contributed to the circumstances leading up to the incident. The trial highlighted the challenges faced by individuals in emotionally charged situations, particularly when firearms are involved.
In the aftermath of the verdict, Fitzsimmons’ attorney Timothy Bradl remarked, “This should be over. It should be an acquittal, your honor.” The case has drawn significant public attention, raising questions about mental health, gun safety, and the legal system’s handling of such incidents.
As the community processes the outcome of the trial, reactions continue to emerge, reflecting a mix of relief and concern over the implications of the case. Details remain unconfirmed regarding any potential appeals or further legal actions that may arise from this incident.